Performance Appraisal and Managing Performance

Performance Evaluations Identify Employee Performance Improvements

© Roger Lever

Jan 23, 2009
Performance Appraisal, nkzs
Every manager with line management responsibility must engage in employee performance management. Regularly do performance evaluations to identify performance improvement

Employee performance management is based on the simple plan-do-review cycle and whilst this is simple in theory it is more difficult to do in practice. The difficulty is primarily focused on three system factors: objective, fair and transparent. In addition, some will find it difficult to deal with potentially emotive employee discussions about performance or development.

Set Clear Performance Objectives

Performance evaluation can only start after clear performance objectives have been agreed and set as noted in the quick guide to employee performance management. Without clear objectives there is scope for:

  • Confusion. What are the actual objectives?
  • Misunderstanding. What is communicated is not properly understood. Parties operate under a different set of expectations about what needs to be done, the expected quality and timeline
  • Lack of Clarity. Miscommunication or unclear communication; some parts of the objective are clear but other parts are not and this consequently leads to assumptions and mistakes
  • Assumptions. Objective is either not met or only partially met because the assumptions are simply not true, for example the employee has the tools or training to do the job

Performance Evaluation

With clear objectives it is much easier to do regular performance evaluation and good or excellent performance is the desired assessment. However, there may be situations when this is not the case and the indicators include:

  • Objective tasks are late. Has the timeline for the objective slipped? Is this due to third party dependencies or employee performance? If it is employee performance-related then there is a further series of factors to consider
  • Expected deliverables have not been produced. This needs to be investigated as to why they have not been produced
  • Expected deliverables are below the required quality standards (unclear, incomplete, inaccurate...). Is the employee solely responsible for the deliverable or are there other factors to consider?
  • Employee behaviours are inconsistent with organisation standards. This range of behaviours could include poor time-keeping or inappropriate interaction with team members or customers

Employee Performance

If employee performance is found to be less than the expected level of performance then this must be investigated and, if appropriate, a formal appraisal should be carried out including 360-degree feedback. Ideally, start with an informal investigation as the root causes may not warrant a more formal approach. In particular, the root causes of performance must be identified as these will determine future actions. Root causes for less than expected performance may include:

  • Personal issues that are impacting performance such as bereavement, close family member sickness, financial or relationship worries
  • Workplace issues that are impacting performance such as helping other colleagues to meet their objectives before own objectives, issues with the work environment such as an excessively noisy office or frequent interruptions
  • Overloaded with too many objectives or conflicting priorities, especially in a matrix management environment
  • Team issues such as working relationship with other team members, dependencies on others to complete their objectives first, access to needed tools, experts or third-party suppliers
  • Employee development issues such as lack of training, experience or expertise to complete the required objective, or lack of people skills to work and deal effectively with others in the situations the employee is in

Performance Improvement

If employee development is required for performance improvement then solving these performance problems should be straightforward with a clear understanding of root causes. Possible approaches include changing the work environment, better prioritisation of conflicting priorities, time off, additional training, shadow or buddy system, mentoring or coaching, changing team environment or set objectives and so on.


The copyright of the article Performance Appraisal and Managing Performance in Human Resources Management is owned by Roger Lever. Permission to republish Performance Appraisal and Managing Performance in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Performance Appraisal, nkzs
Performance Management, lusi
Performance Objectives, sachyn
Performance Improvement, vincitrice
Employee Development, woodsy


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo